如果只是看到Amerigeddon的娱乐价值那就大大贬低了这部电影了

首先我们来看看这篇名为《美国迦顿制作人的警告》，我相信深度瓣友是有能力读懂这篇通俗易懂的文章的。Norris,theeldestsonofmartialarts,filmandtelevisionstarandWNDexclusivecolumnistChuckNorris,toldWNDhehopesthatit’sentertainingandthatpeoplecomeawaywithamessage.Thingsgotjustalittlebiteeriewhilethefilmwasbeingmade,withmany“bizarrecoincidences,”hesaid.Forexample,thefilm’splotincludesanuclearattack,andnowNorthKoreaisthreateningtheU.S.Themoviealsotouchesonweaponconfiscation,justasPresidentObamahasbeenpressingformoreguncontrol.Then,oneoftheheroesisfacedwiththeheavyhandofgovernmentwhileinreallifethefederalgovernment’smassiveJadeHelmmilitaryexerciseintheSouthwesthasraisedpersonallibertyconcerns.Inthemovie,anelectromagneticpulseattackovertheU.S.wipesouttheenergygrid,alongwithallelectronicdevices,suchasphones,creditcardprocessingsystemsandcomputers.TheAmericangovernmentreactstotheattack,whichwasstagedwiththehelpoftheU.N.,bydeclaringmartiallawandstrippingAmericansoftheirconstitutionalrightsandtheirguns.“Ourgovernment,boughtandpaidforandruledfromthebench,isourbadguy,”Norrisexplained.“TheheroesareagroupofAmericanswhosay,‘WehaveaConstitutionandaBillofRightsandwewillnotbetrampledon.”“Amerigeddon”touchesonglobalistissuessuchastheNewWorldOrderandtheNationalDefenseAuthorizationAct.“We’vejusttakenourstoryandstrippeditdowntorealpeople,realissues,realthingsthatarehappening,”hesaid.“Itisamovie,itisfictional.Butitisverymuchanewsreel,”hesaid.“Ifyouweretojustopenanewspaperandlookatwhat’sgoingonintheworld,thisisourmovie.”NorrissaidhehasbeenmakingChristianfilmssincehedirected“Walker,TexasRanger,”hisfather’stelevisionhit,inthe1990s.Hesaidhehopes“Amerigeddon”makespeoplethinkabouttheConstitution,theBillofRightsandtheSecondAmendment,becausetherearerealworldimplications.Forexample,“IfwegetthewrongSupremeCourtjudge,it’sover,”hesaid.“ANationForsaken”byMichaelMalooflaysouttherealityofanEMPattack,andit’snotpretty.AvailableattheWNDSuperstore.Themovieprojectbegansome18monthsagowhenHeavinwrotethescreenplay.Norrissaidhefirstdoubtedthestoryline,butashebegantoseeevidenceoftyrannyeveninAmerica,itsuddenlyseemedappropriate.Hesaidthefilmtriestoconveythat“wefeelthegovernmentisoverreachingitsauthority;Obamaisrulingfromthebench,ourrightsarebeinginfringedonadailybasis.”ItalsowarnsthatapowerfulEMPcouldbringAmericatoitsknees,destroyingpower,communications,theInternet,transportation,shippingandnaturalgassupplies.MikeNorris,wholivesinDallas,gothisinspirationtoworkinfilmonthesetofhisfather’smovies.“Amerigeddon”isonlythefirstinaseriesofplannedfilmsandTVprojectsthroughwhichNorrisandHeavinhopetopromotepatrioticvalues.NorristoldWNDthenextfilmwillportraywhattheworldwouldlooklikeayearafteranEMPstrike.TheyalsohopetoexplorewhatwouldhappenifthebanksdeclaredaholidayinAmericaasthey’vedoneinGreece.文章指出电影“直白而露骨”“毫无忌讳”地讨论枪支管理、核武器控制、美国暴力执政、全球主义等热点问题，还抨击了资本家单纯追求利益罕有回报社会的丑恶，执政过度的tyranny，转基因研究不足之下的盲目推广，我觉得更是对自由的具体社会思考。近期我也看了一部豆瓣评分极低的电影叫做《验收测试》，一部对于思考枪支管理的电影。可能因为在国内个人不能合法拥有枪支有关，所以难以成为大众讨论的热点。但是从近期层出不穷的暴力事件的网络舆论来看，似乎呼吁效仿美国的个人枪支拥有合法化的讨论正在兴起。个人合法拥有枪支好吗？一味禁止个人拥有枪支好吗？全球主义好吗？通过什么手段达成？不怕被暴政者所利用形成新的暴政吗？（电影里贪婪自私的资本家说“地球最多只能容纳5亿人，我们愿意杀死70亿人，大多数人不值得活着，大量的非洲人、印度人和拆哪人过着贫穷的生活，他们不如死了的好。没了他们，世界将更加美好，甚至先从美国开始……”）制作人给出的答案既黑暗又带有光明，人们终将站起来反抗。有如文章指出，制片人将在下一部作品中提出对于EMP攻击之后的想象，如果全球恐怖袭击了，人们将何去何从。电影有着深刻的思考，我的能力有限无法完全解读，至少我觉得凭内容而言，这部电影不应该只有3.7这么低分。倘若只考虑他的商业利益，是的，五毛特效，故事情节发展单一枯燥（演员还是很卖力的点个赞）。或许身为市井屁民的我们来说，思考这些问题犹如杞人忧天，狗拿耗子，但作为一个人来说，想要在一个社会立足，必须要对自由有深刻的思考，才能在某个时刻明白自己该站什么队。